Expert Judgment in Risk Analysis
نویسنده
چکیده
Experts are often used to provide uncertainty distributions in risk analyses. They play an importantrole when insufficient data exist for quantification, or when the available data or models are conflicting. Multiplesteps are required in constructing a successful expert judgment process. These steps include selecting andframing the issues, identifying the experts, deciding upon an organization structure, and possibly combiningthe distributions from multiple experts.Expert judgments are normally given as probabilities or probability distributions that express the uncertaintyabout future events or unmeasured quantities. The goodness of probabilistic judgments is measured throughcalibration and information, which, in turn, can be measured through a scoring rule.Various behavioral and mathematical methods have been proposed for combining the judgments of experts.There is, however, no single method that has emerged as the best.
منابع مشابه
Analysis of Correlated Expert Judgments from Extended Pairwise Comparisons
We develop a Bayesian multivariate analysis of expert judgment elicited using an extended form of pair-wise comparisons. The method can be used to estimate the effect of multiple factors on the probability of an event and can be applied in risk analysis and other decision problems. The analysis provides variance predictions of the quantity of interest that incorporate dependencies amongst the v...
متن کاملCombining experts' judgments: comparison of algorithmic methods using synthetic data.
Expert judgment (or expert elicitation) is a formal process for eliciting judgments from subject-matter experts about the value of a decision-relevant quantity. Judgments in the form of subjective probability distributions are obtained from several experts, raising the question how best to combine information from multiple experts. A number of algorithmic approaches have been proposed, of which...
متن کاملExpert elicitation of the value per statistical life in an air pollution context.
The monetized value of avoided premature mortality typically dominates the calculated benefits of air pollution regulations; therefore, characterization of the uncertainty surrounding these estimates is key to good policymaking. Formal expert judgment elicitation methods are one means of characterizing this uncertainty. They have been applied to characterize uncertainty in the mortality concent...
متن کاملUsing Expert Judgments to Estimate the Multipliers of Performance Shaping Factors in Digital Main Control Rooms of Nuclear Power Plants
The lack of human performance data in human reliability analysis (HRA) has been lamented in the literature for a long time. It can increase the variability, uncertainty, unreliability of HRA outcomes to probabilistic risk analysis (PRA). This situation is even worse for PRA/HRA in digital main control rooms (MCRs) of nuclear power plants (NPPs). Expert judgment is used when data is unavailable....
متن کاملA Bayesian Model for Rare Event Risk Assessment Using Expert Judgment about Paired Scenario Comparisons
When challenged with understanding complex, technological systems, managers often use analysis to characterize risk. Managers use this information to design projects, develop policy, and allocate resources in order to mitigate system risk. This paper presents a Bayesian risk analysis methodology for combining expert judgment with the manager’s prior system knowledge to allow identification of r...
متن کاملRisk analysis for autonomous underwater vehicle operations in extreme environments.
Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are used increasingly to explore hazardous marine environments. Risk assessment for such complex systems is based on subjective judgment and expert knowledge as much as on hard statistics. Here, we describe the use of a risk management process tailored to AUV operations, the implementation of which requires the elicitation of expert judgment. We conducted a...
متن کامل